সাহিত্য বিশ্লেষণ লেবেলটি সহ পোস্টগুলি দেখানো হচ্ছে৷ সকল পোস্ট দেখান
সাহিত্য বিশ্লেষণ লেবেলটি সহ পোস্টগুলি দেখানো হচ্ছে৷ সকল পোস্ট দেখান

বুধবার, ১ জুলাই, ২০২০

তরুন সংগঠক সিএম ওয়াছি জিতুর নেতৃত্বে কালভার্ট সংস্কার

তরুন সংগঠক সিএম ওয়াছি জিতুর নেতৃত্বে কালভার্ট সংস্কার।

লক্ষীপুর জেলার সদর উপজেলার ১৪ নং মান্দারী ইউনিয়ন এর ৩ নং ওয়ার্ড মটবী গ্রাম একটি জনবহুল ও গুরুত্বপূর্ণ গ্রাম।এই গ্রাম এর প্রধান সড়ক এর মাঝামাঝি অবস্থানে একটি কালভার্ট রয়েছে,যা গত ৮ মাস আগে ৬৫ ভাগ ধসে পড়ে যায়, এতে জনদুর্ভোগ সৃষ্টি হয়।
ছবিঃ ভাঙ্গা কালভার্ট 

গত কয়েকমাসে অন্ধকার রাতে অসচেতনতায় পড়ে কমপক্ষে ৯ জন লোক আহত হয়েছেন বলে জানা যায়।স্থানীয় প্রতিনিধি মেম্বার এর সাথে কথা বলে জানা গেলো এই কালভার্টের টেন্ডার হয়ে গেছে কিন্তু বৈশ্ব্যিক অর্থনীতি মন্দা ও করোনা ভাইরাস প্রাদুর্ভাবের কারনে কাজটা করা সম্ভব হচ্ছে না।
সত্য ঘটনা পড়তে- পুলিশ ডায়েরী  

এই সম্পর্কে সিএম ওয়াছি উদ্দিন জিতু বলেন, উক্ত ভাংগা অংশে এই এলাকার ৪ জন সহ প্রায় ৯ জন লোক অসচেতনতায় পড়ে আহত হয়েছেন, তাই কিছু তরুন ও যুবসমাজ এর সাহস ও সহযোগিতা নিয়ে সংস্কার কাজ সম্পূর্ণ করেছি।
ছবিঃ কর্মরত এলাকার সাধারণ মানুষ 


ঐ এলাকার বাসিন্দাদের সাথে এই সম্পর্কে কথা  বললে তারা বলেন "অনেকদিন এর দুর্ভোগ নিরোসন হওয়ায় তারা আনন্দিত এবং সিএম ওয়াছি জিতু সহ এই কাজের সাথে সংশ্লিষ্ট সকলকে আন্তরিক ধন্যবাদ জ্ঞাপন ও দোয়া করছেন"।



সোমবার, ৮ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

Coleridge's Distinction between Primary Imagination, Secondary Imagination & Fancy



Coleridge gave much thought to the Imagination. He considers poetry the product of the secondary imagination. The secondary imagination dissolves, diffuses and dissipates in order to recreate; it struggles to idealize and unify.

The two Cardinal Points of poetry according to Coleridge are:
1) The power of exciting the sympathy of the reader by a faithful adherence to the truth of nature.
2) The power of giving the interest of novelty by the modifying colors of Imagination.

Primary Imagination: (Living power and prime agent of all human perception). Coleridge asserts that the mind is active in perception. This activity which is subconscious and is the common birthright of all men is the work of the Primary Imagination, which may be defined as the inborn power of perceiving that makes it possible for us to know things. The Primary Imagination is a repetition in the finite mind of the eternal act of creation in the infinite I AM. The power of perception, Coleridge called as Primary Imagination whereas the poetic imagination as the Secondary Imagination. It differs from the Primary Imagination in degree, but not in kind. While all men possess the Primary, only some men possess the heightened degree of the universally human power to which the poet lays claim.

Secondary Imagination: (Echo of the Primary Imagination) differs in two important respects from Primary Imagination. First, Primary Imagination is subconscious, while Secondary Imagination coexists "with the conscious will" and involves, therefore, elements of conscious and subconscious activity. Poetic "making" blends conscious selection with subconscious infusion, some elements are intentionally chosen while others are mysteriously given or supplied from the deepness of the poet's subconscious mind. Second, the secondary Imagination is described as a power that "dissolves, diffuses, dissipates, in order to recreate." It dissolves and then reintegrates the components in a new way that draws attention to their coalescence. Secondary Imagination bridges the gap between the world of spirit and matter; it fuses perception, intellect, feeling, passions and memory. It struggles to idealize and unify.

Fancy: On the other hand, is distinguished from Imagination (both primary and secondary) because it is not poetic. It differs from Imagination in kind. Fancy is merely aggregative and associative; it is a mode of memory receiving all its materials ready made from the law of association. In other words, fancy joins without blending; it works together with the pre-existing sensations without creating anything originally new, fabricates without refashioning the elements which it combines.

To Coleridge poetry was fundamentally and formally distinct from other modes of writing, and it possesses a logic of its own, as severe as that of science, and more difficult, because more subtle, more complex, and dependent on more and more fugitive causes. Poetry could and should bring together thought and feeling; it should reconcile the workings of both the head and the heart. Coleridge says that Wordsworth had unified thought and feeling in poetic utterance; he has both realized and idealized the commonplace and had made the reader see man and nature as if he was seeing them for the first time. Therefore; at times he seems to be still aware of the sensationalist philosophy of his youth which from it he inherits a conception of a world of facts, an inanimate cold world in which objects as objects are essentially "fixed and dead." But as a poet, his task is to transform it by the imagination. He has a deep trust in the imagination and considers it as something which gives shape to life. His dead world may be brought to life by Imagination. He believes that meaning is found for the existence through the exercise of the creative activity which is akin to that of god.

As a poet, Coleridge was fascinated by the notion of unearthly power at work in the world. Thus, because of his belief that life is ruled by powers which cannot be fully understood, the result is a poetry more mysterious than that of any Romantic. However, because it is based on primary human emotions, he thought that the task of poetry is to convey the mystery of life. Coleridge believes in Imagination as a vehicle for truth. He felt about the creation of his imagination something similar to what he felt about dreams. He assumes that while we have them, we do not question their reality. Coleridge believes that creation needs joy, so without joy, the poet is helpless and miserable.      

A poem Coleridge defines as an organic construct which, unlike works of science, proposes for its immediate object "Pleasure not Truth." In other words, while the truth is the ultimate end of poetry, pleasure is its immediate end. Coleridge's definition of the ideal poet is characterized by its emphasis on imagination. The poet described in ideal perfection, brings the whole soul of man into activity, with the subordination of its faculties to each other, according to their relative worth and dignity. He diffuses a tone and spirit of unity, that blends and fuses each into each by that magical power, imagination, and synthesis. In Coleridge's view, Wordsworth's particular genius was Miltonic; his strength lay, as the Prelude had demonstrated, in impressing the stamp of his own mind and character on all that he chose to write about.


@unknown source

সোমবার, ১ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

Main differences between Structuralism and Post-Structuralism


1) Theoretical differences:

structuralism: Structuralism was a literary movement primarily concerned with understanding how language works as a system of meaning production. Focusing on the form or structure of the literary work, and the particular use of language
in the work would allow structuralists to think of language as a kind of science.
Post-structuralism, on the other hand, is less singularly defined as a movement than structuralism. Post-structuralists accuse structuralists of not following through the implications of the views about the language on which their intellectual
system is based. Post-structuralism offers a way of studying how knowledge is produced and critiques structuralist premises
. A post-structuralist approach argues that to understand an object (e.g., a text), it is necessary to study both the object itself and the systems of knowledge that produced the object.

2) Origins: Structuralism derives ultimately from linguistics. It
believes that if we observe accurately, collect data systematically
and make logical deductions then we can reach reliable conclusions
about language and the world.
 By contrast, post-structuralism derives ultimately from philosophy
which has always tended to emphasize the difficulty of achieving
secure knowledge about things. They inherit the habit of skepticism
and intensify it. 
3) Attitude to language: Structuralists accept that the world is constructed
through language in the sense that we do not have access to
reality other than through the linguistic system.
By contrast,
post-structuralism is much more fundamental in insisting upon the consequences
of the view that, in effect, reality itself is textual.

4)Practical differences: The post-structuralist literary critic is engaged in the task of
'deconstructing' the text. This process can be roughly defined as
'applied post-structuralism'. It is often referred to as 'reading against
the grain' or 'reading the text against itself', with the purpose
of 'knowing the text as it cannot know itself'. (Terry
Eagleton's definitions)
 At the same time, structuralists look for features
like parallels, echoes, and reflections. The deconstructionist looks
for evidence of gaps, breaks, and discontinuities of all kinds.